Review



3d imaging device artec leo  (ARTEC CO LTD)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ARTEC CO LTD 3d imaging device artec leo
    <t>iPhone</t> <t>XR</t> test set-up with the mannequin, tripod and rotating arm with a turning radius of 230°.
    3d Imaging Device Artec Leo, supplied by ARTEC CO LTD, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/3d imaging device artec leo/product/ARTEC CO LTD
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3d imaging device artec leo - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "A comparative study of 3D measuring methods for monitoring breast volume changes"

    Article Title: A comparative study of 3D measuring methods for monitoring breast volume changes

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305059

    iPhone XR test set-up with the mannequin, tripod and rotating arm with a turning radius of 230°.
    Figure Legend Snippet: iPhone XR test set-up with the mannequin, tripod and rotating arm with a turning radius of 230°.

    Techniques Used:

    Volume differences from expected volume per scanner.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Volume differences from expected volume per scanner.

    Techniques Used: Software

    (A) Vectra XT versus Artec LEO, (B) iPhone XR versus Vectra XT, (C) iPhone XR versus Artec LEO. Surface deviations are indicated by the coloured scale on the right. Red indicates a positive surface deviation, blue indicates a negative surface deviation. Arithmetic means are shown in the middle: A -0.01 mm, B +0.33 mm, C +0.30 mm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Vectra XT versus Artec LEO, (B) iPhone XR versus Vectra XT, (C) iPhone XR versus Artec LEO. Surface deviations are indicated by the coloured scale on the right. Red indicates a positive surface deviation, blue indicates a negative surface deviation. Arithmetic means are shown in the middle: A -0.01 mm, B +0.33 mm, C +0.30 mm.

    Techniques Used:

    Summary of the costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects of each 3D method.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Summary of the costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects of each 3D method.

    Techniques Used: Software



    Similar Products

    3d imaging device artec leo  (ARTEC CO LTD)
    90
    ARTEC CO LTD 3d imaging device artec leo
    <t>iPhone</t> <t>XR</t> test set-up with the mannequin, tripod and rotating arm with a turning radius of 230°.
    3d Imaging Device Artec Leo, supplied by ARTEC CO LTD, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/3d imaging device artec leo/product/ARTEC CO LTD
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3d imaging device artec leo - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    iPhone XR test set-up with the mannequin, tripod and rotating arm with a turning radius of 230°.

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    Article Title: A comparative study of 3D measuring methods for monitoring breast volume changes

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305059

    Figure Lengend Snippet: iPhone XR test set-up with the mannequin, tripod and rotating arm with a turning radius of 230°.

    Article Snippet: For this purpose, we compared the performance of three different 3D imaging devices: the Vectra XT, the Artec LEO and the iPhone XR and performed an assessment of accuracy, costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects, bearing in mind implementation in breast volumetric research in transgender individuals.

    Techniques:

    Volume differences from expected volume per scanner.

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    Article Title: A comparative study of 3D measuring methods for monitoring breast volume changes

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305059

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Volume differences from expected volume per scanner.

    Article Snippet: For this purpose, we compared the performance of three different 3D imaging devices: the Vectra XT, the Artec LEO and the iPhone XR and performed an assessment of accuracy, costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects, bearing in mind implementation in breast volumetric research in transgender individuals.

    Techniques: Software

    (A) Vectra XT versus Artec LEO, (B) iPhone XR versus Vectra XT, (C) iPhone XR versus Artec LEO. Surface deviations are indicated by the coloured scale on the right. Red indicates a positive surface deviation, blue indicates a negative surface deviation. Arithmetic means are shown in the middle: A -0.01 mm, B +0.33 mm, C +0.30 mm.

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    Article Title: A comparative study of 3D measuring methods for monitoring breast volume changes

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305059

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Vectra XT versus Artec LEO, (B) iPhone XR versus Vectra XT, (C) iPhone XR versus Artec LEO. Surface deviations are indicated by the coloured scale on the right. Red indicates a positive surface deviation, blue indicates a negative surface deviation. Arithmetic means are shown in the middle: A -0.01 mm, B +0.33 mm, C +0.30 mm.

    Article Snippet: For this purpose, we compared the performance of three different 3D imaging devices: the Vectra XT, the Artec LEO and the iPhone XR and performed an assessment of accuracy, costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects, bearing in mind implementation in breast volumetric research in transgender individuals.

    Techniques:

    Summary of the costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects of each 3D method.

    Journal: PLOS ONE

    Article Title: A comparative study of 3D measuring methods for monitoring breast volume changes

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305059

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of the costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects of each 3D method.

    Article Snippet: For this purpose, we compared the performance of three different 3D imaging devices: the Vectra XT, the Artec LEO and the iPhone XR and performed an assessment of accuracy, costs, user-friendliness, test subject-friendliness and technical aspects, bearing in mind implementation in breast volumetric research in transgender individuals.

    Techniques: Software